 Mother Teresa is considered by many to be a saint for her supposed  selfless dedication in the service of humanity. However, some have  accused her of being a rather mean and ghoulish character and running an  orphanage where children were maltreated and abused. Some also accuse  her of taking money that was meant for the poor and funneling it back to  the Vatican for her own personal recognition.(Abusing  Children Mother Teresa Style by Atuna Dey)
Mother Teresa is considered by many to be a saint for her supposed  selfless dedication in the service of humanity. However, some have  accused her of being a rather mean and ghoulish character and running an  orphanage where children were maltreated and abused. Some also accuse  her of taking money that was meant for the poor and funneling it back to  the Vatican for her own personal recognition.(Abusing  Children Mother Teresa Style by Atuna Dey) In Christopher  Hitchens opinion, the reason that Mother Teresa is so highly  revered amongst not only the Catholic community, but also other  religious and even non-religion groups and individuals is:
 Partly because that impression is so widespread. But also  because the sheer fact that this is considered unquestionable is a sign  of what we are up against, namely the problem of credulity. One of the  most salient examples of people’s willingness to believe anything if it  is garbed in the appearance of holiness is the uncritical acceptance of  the idea of Mother Teresa as a saint by people who would normally be  thinking – however lazily – in a secular or rational manner. In other  words, in every sense it is an unexamined claim.
 In his book The  Missionary Postion, Hitchens  labels Mother Teresa ” the  “Ghoul of Calcutta” a “fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud”   amongst other things, and there are others who share that same viewpoint  for good reasons. Unfortunately most sheeple people will not even  bother to listen to or consider these accusations.
 In his above-mentioned post on his blog Atanu  Dey on India’s Development, Dey writes: 
 What exactly is my main grouse with M. Teresa? I think  that she was evil. She manipulated others and cheated them, and she did  so on the backs of Kolkata’s miserable. She was the most famous “beggar  lord” – a person who makes a living by taking the money that people give  to beggars and using that money for some other purpose. In her case, it  is suspected that the money is funneled to the Vatican so that she  would get on the fast tract to being canonized. 
 And now we have this story reported in the news recently:
 Light  the Empire State Building to honor Mother Teresa, or else?
 Catholic forces in New York City are not-so-quietly  mobilizing a massive petition drive, protest, lobbying effort and media  campaign to attempt to force the owner of the Empire State Building to  light the building blue and white on August 26 in honor of Mother  Teresa’s 100th birthday. Their efforts have even infiltrated the City  Council of New York City, in the form of a resolution  which was  referred  to committee at the council meeting on June 9.
 The City Council resolution introduced by Councilman Peter Vallone  Jr. would force the building owner to honor the New York City Catholic  League’s lighting request.
 According to the New York Post, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn  was infuriated by the owner’s refusal to light the building to honor  Teresa. Quinn said: “I just think it’s a really wrongheaded decision.”
 Anthony E. Malkin, who privately owns the Empire State Building, said  the building “has a specific policy against any other lighting for  religious figures or requests by religions and religious organizations.”
 The New York Post (June 9) featured a full-page cover story  and  photo of the Empire State Building with a huge headline: “THE EVIL  EMPIRE.” The Catholic League plans to demonstrate outside the Empire  State Building on August 26 and has collected 40,000 signatures for a  petition in support of the Mother Teresa lighting.
 These Catholics are as bad, if not worse than the evangelical  protestants when it comes to their lack of consideration for freedom of  and freedom from religion. The building is privately owned. The  owner can choose to do whatever he wants with this demand. He can honor  it, or ignore it. And we know when there is “religious uprising” when  they can’t have their way, there could be violence. They say so  themselves.
 The president of the Catholic League griped: “I think  that too many Catholics have fallen asleep at the wheel. It’s time for  people, the rank and file to say enough is enough. I hope it’s going to  be nonviolent, I wouldn’t encourage violence but I know there’s a lot of  anger.”
 So they are pissed off because a private building owner will  not light his building to honor a certain denominations religious icon,  and a ghoulish one at that. What’s really mind-boggling is that the  city hall is getting involved instead of just standing firm that it is  not their business to promote or make special accommodations for  any  religion.
 Speaker Quinn has additionally joined with Mayor Michael  Bloomberg to declare August 26 a “day of service in honor of Mother  Teresa.”
 Quinn said: “The Empire State Building does not have final say on how  Mother Teresa’s life should be honored. That’s why we in the Council  are inviting all New Yorkers on August 26th, light up their own windows,  homes, businesses in blue and white as a tribute to her. Lighting up  the Empire State Building as a tribute to her would be great. But  honoring such an inspiring woman does not have to be limited to a single  building.”
 Fine, light up your own damn windows any way you choose, honor and  worship the Ghoul of Calcutta if you choose to on your own property, in  your own deluded way. But should the city council be promoting or  encouraging such a thing?
 “It is inappropriate and unseemly for city council  representatives to use their office to promote a denominational  religious figure such as the nun, Mother Teresa,” the Freedom From  Religion Foundation said.
 I agree, it is inappropriate. Once again, a religious  community has no respect for the separation of church and state and is  trying to bully a private citizen to get its way using elected  government officials.
 As the article states, “August 26 has long been celebrated as Women’s  Equality Day by feminists as the date in 1920 when U.S. women finally  won the right to vote, enshrined as the suffrage amendment — the 19th  Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.”
 Let’s keep August 26th “Celebrate Women’s Equality Day”,  Not birth of Mother Teresa, Ghoul of Calcutta day.